|
Opposite editorial
- International
- Libya - Panafrica - United States
Because somebody has to stand up against tyranny and oppressive governments, I disagree with the several African leaders who have parochially condemned the international military coalition aimed at deterring Muammar Gaddafi’s forces and mercenaries who are violently crushing civil protests against an iron-fisted, corrupt and tyrannical regime in Libya. Agreed, military intervention has its pitfalls, but the chaotic international system needs the services of physical security, commercial regulation, financial stability and legal alternative in a backdrop of universal human rights.
|
|
|
|
your opinion
your opinion
• Responsibility to Protect: A moral case for the U.S and its allies in Libya - Responsibility to protect oil - Thursday 24 March 2011 - 20:28
• Responsibility to Protect: A moral case for the U.S and its allies in Libya - Why dont we start with protecting the Palestinians whose land is been swallowed away by the Israelis. It is a pity the same countries never thought of protecting South Africans. Nice to see them supporting rebels in Libya. The ANC and SWAPO were designated as terrorist organisations.On the other hand organisations like UNITA and FRELIMO were funded by the USA and its allies. I honestly dont understand how somebody can think that the USA can be an impartial policeman of the world. - Wednesday 23 March 2011 - 20:10
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
